We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
We have recently carried out a recruitment process and are not currently recruiting more IPMs.
However, if you are interested in this role, please email [email protected] and we will be happy to keep your name on a list of potential applicants who we will notify when the role is advertised again in the future.
Police Misconduct Hearings and Police Appeals Tribunals are governed by statute. The purpose of the police misconduct regime is to:
A Police Misconduct Hearing Panel is likely to be convened to hear allegations of serious cases of misconduct by police officers. The most severe outcome at this hearing would be dismissal from the police service without notice. Cases would include for example, allegations of criminal acts, serious road traffic matters such as drink/driving and other serious breaches of the standards of professional behaviour expected of police officers such as neglect of duty.
Police Appeals Tribunals deal with appeals from misconduct hearings and fast track hearings and appeals by senior officers from misconduct meetings.
Until 2008 cases of alleged serious misconduct were heard by Chief Constables, or on their behalf by another senior police officer. From 2008, a misconduct hearing panel of three comprised a senior police officer, another officer senior in rank to the accused officer and a lay person.
Between 2012-2024 the panel for each case comprised three persons: a legally qualified chair (LQC), a senior police officer (usually a Superintendent or Chief Superintendent) and an Independent Panel Member (IPM).
Since May 2024 the panel consists of three people: the Chair (the Chief Constable or delegated senior person), an IPM with relevant experience and a second IPM. There is no difference between the two IPMs in terms of responsibility or payments. A Legally Qualified Person (LQP) is also appointed to give guidance to the panel (but they do not have a decision-making role).
Since 2014 police misconduct cases have been heard in public, except where there are special reasons for all or part of a hearing to be in private.
A Police Appeals Tribunal consists of a Chair drawn from a list appointed by the Home Secretary, a senior officer and an IPM.
The role of an Independent Panel Member is to sit on Police Misconduct Hearing Panels and Police Appeal Tribunals and assist misconduct panels in determining a fair and evidence-based judgement about a particular police officer’s conduct and agreeing an appropriate sanction.
Further information can be found in the in the IPM Handbook which has been produced by the Association of Policing and Crime Chief Executives (APACCE). This is an advisory document but for the sake of national and regional consistency, Wiltshire OPCC relies on its provisions (except where it specifically departs from them).
The aim of the role is to provide reassurance to the community that misconduct matters are properly investigated, and proceedings properly adjudicated, and to ensure that there is an independent and impartial voice on such panels.
Candidates must be able to demonstrate the competencies required for the role:
The following would be an advantage:
The ‘relevant experience’ required by legislation for one of the two IPMs appointed for a misconduct hearing may include experience of leadership or professional regulations, tribunals or other legal processes and of working with disciplinary procedures across the private public or voluntary sector. There is no difference between the two IPMs in terms of responsibility or payments.
There is no upper or lower age limit for candidates for this post (apart from any statutory retirement age for judicial appointments).
The appointment will be subject to satisfactory references and criminal record and security vetting checks, including social network checks and attendance at training.
The PCC and Wiltshire Police value diversity and welcome applications from all our communities.
The independence and impartiality of an Independent Panel Member is a fundamental requirement, therefore exclusions apply (please see full job description for details).
The key responsibilities of an IPM include:
The Appointment is for a term of 5 years which may be extended by agreement.
Misconduct cases are triggered by the officer receiving notice of misconduct proceedings. Although cases are unpredictable in nature and frequency, it is estimated an IPM should expect to sit on a panel for 2 - 4 cases per annum with the duration unknown.
If you have been appointed to the panel list (following a recruitment process which includes security vetting, satisfactory references and the completion of training) you will be eligible to sit on a panel for a specific gross misconduct hearing. Each panel requires 2 IPMs, one of whom has ‘relevant experience’ (which may include experience of leadership or professional regulations, tribunals or other legal processes and of working with disciplinary procedures across the private public or voluntary sector).
In the interests of fairness and transparency IPMs are normally selected for a hearing from the panel list using the ‘cab rank’ system. This means the OPCC will select the next IPM on the list and request their availability for the hearing date. If an IPM is not available, the OPCC will go to the next one on the list (and so on) and the IPM who was not available will remain at the front of the list for next time. If the IPM is available, they will be formally appointed to that hearing in accordance with Regulation 28 of the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020 as amended.
Fees and expenses are paid in accordance with the Scheme of Allowances.
The main points are summarised below:
Full day i.e. sittings of more than 4 hours (excluding meal breaks): £357.00
Half day i.e. sittings of 4 hours or less (excluding meal breaks): £178.50
The "fees" rates may be claimed only for sitting on a Misconduct Panel or PAT.
A fee may also be claimed at the rate of £25.00 for each hour necessarily spent in preparatory work. This fee may, however, only be claimed where it is necessary for the work to be undertaken on a day other than the day on which the hearing takes place, (except that a fee may be claimed even in these circumstances if the hearing fee is paid at the half-day rate).
Travel and expenses are paid according to the Scheme of Allowances for the OPCC.
We have recently carried out a recruitment process and are not currently recruiting more IPMs. However, if you are interested in this role, please email [email protected] and we will be happy to keep your name on a list of potential applicants who we will notify when the role is advertised again in the future.